Cross-Framework Translation

Indicative equivalences by framework

Published framework

NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, and EU AI Act equivalences are indicative readings, not official certifications.

NIST AI RMF

  • Security → NIST Manage + Measure (misuse safeguards, testing, incident handling)
  • Stability → NIST Manage (continuity, monitoring, recovery)
  • Coherence → NIST Map + Measure (risk identification, behavior measurement)
  • Reputation → NIST Govern (external trust and accountability)
  • Transparency → NIST Govern (documentation, explainability)

Estimated NIST AI RMF maturity tier: Tier 3/4

ISO/IEC 42001

  • Security → clause 6 (risk treatment) + clause 8 (operational controls)
  • Stability → clause 8 (Operations) + clause 10 (Improvement)
  • Coherence → clause 6 (Planning) + clause 9 (Performance evaluation)
  • Reputation → clause 7 (Support)
  • Transparency → clause 4 (Context) + clause 5 (Leadership)

Estimated ISO 42001 coverage: 84%

EU AI Act

Articles 15, 16, 26, 50 mapped to Kanon dimensions.

Article 15 : Aligned

Kanon mapping: Security + Stability

Article 16 : Aligned

Kanon mapping: Security + Stability + Coherence + Transparency

Article 26 : Partial

Kanon mapping: Security + Transparency

Article 50 : Partial

Kanon mapping: Transparency

Sources used

Evidence preserved for this rating

Review methodology

Homepage metadata

Homepage metadata review

Homepage metadata reviewed from the public site. Title observed: FinalCheck — Your AI's Last Line of Defense. Meta description or visible summary: FinalCheck reviews AI-generated outputs before they ship — catching errors, hallucinations, tone issues, and policy violations in real-time.

Open source

Official site

Official site review

Homepage returned HTTP 200. Title observed: FinalCheck — Your AI's Last Line of Defense. Public offer summary: FinalCheck reviews AI-generated outputs before they ship — catching errors, hallucinations, tone issues, and policy violations in real-time.

Open source

Operational evidence

Operational surface scan

Accessible public pages: /, /docs. Signals detected: service public reachable, pricing or demo CTA visible, technical or integration surface visible, public traction signals visible.

Open source

Public disclosure review

Disclosure and counter-argument review

Disclosure review found pricing/demo signal. Main contrary argument: Even though no privacy policy found, the public record still shows service public reachable.

Open source

Security review

Security v3.2 provisional review

Score Sécurité provisoire v3.2: 56/100 (S1 37, S2 45, S3 80, S4 62). score initial v3.2, susceptible de révision dans les 30 jours. Signaux publics observés: GDPR or DPO claims visible, context or session isolation language, out-of-scope limitations published, uncertainty or verification language, model/provider transparency signal, logs, receipts, or audit trail signal.

Open source

Security evidence

Security evidence surface scan

Pages publiques sécurité/données détectées: /, /docs. Raisons: S1 signalement d'incident ou posture de divulgation visible; S2 signaux RGPD ou droits des personnes, indices publics d'isolation de contexte ou de session; S3 limitations ou usages hors périmètre publiés, signalisation publique d'incertitude ou vérification requise, transparence minimale sur le modèle ou le provider, documentation ou surface produit exploitable, sorties ou contrôles structurés documentés; S4 logs, reçus ou audit trail visibles publiquement, documentation exploitable pour audit externe, schémas, manifests ou confi…

Open source

Dispute

If new material evidence changes the public record, operators can request a review through the public challenge channel.

Dispute this score

FinalCheck is rated B+. Get the one-page gap-to-next-tier report.

Get Gap Report — €19